# Trump Rejects AI Guardrails, Rebrands It 'Super Intelligence'

- URL: https://twotakes.us/stories/trump-rejects-ai-guardrails-rebrands-it-super-intelligence
- Published: 2026-09-23T07:12:23.703592+00:00
- Topics: artificial-intelligence, trump, united-nations, technology-policy, china

## What the left says
- Rejecting international AI safety cooperation at the UN undermines global efforts to address risks like job displacement, misinformation, and loss of human oversight over powerful systems.
- Renaming artificial intelligence to 'super intelligence' is seen as a rhetorical distraction that downplays legitimate scientific and safety concerns rather than addressing them substantively.
- Prioritizing a U.S.-China AI race over establishing shared international guardrails risks a dangerous, unregulated proliferation of the technology.
- Dismissing calls for oversight as a 'globalist scheme' frames necessary safety regulation as a conspiracy, which could leave the public more vulnerable to AI's unintended consequences.

## What the right says
- Maintaining America's technological lead over China is a national security priority that could be jeopardized by burdensome international regulations or globalist control schemes.
- The term 'artificial' undersells the transformative power of the technology, and 'super intelligence' more accurately reflects its capabilities and importance.
- Existing law enforcement and domestic institutions are seen as sufficient to address problems arising from AI without needing new international regulatory bodies.
- Allowing American innovation to flourish without excessive guardrails is viewed as essential to winning the global AI race and securing long-term economic and strategic advantages.

## Common ground
- Both sides agree that AI, whatever it is called, represents a transformative and high-stakes technology.
- Both acknowledge that global competition, particularly with China, is a central factor shaping U.S. AI policy.
- Both recognize that the technology carries significant risks that warrant public attention, even if they disagree on the best response.
- Both sides agree the terminology and framing used to describe AI shapes public perception and policy debates.

## Sources
- [NBC News](https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/trumps-says-the-u-s-will-only-encourage-superintelligence-in-ai-270293573917) (Lean Left)
- [Newsmax](https://www.newsmax.com/politics/trump-united-nations-artificial-intelligence/2026/09/22/id/1270253) (Right)
- [RedState](https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/09/22/trump-globalists-will-never-control-super-intelligence-n2207234) (Unknown)
- [The Hill](https://thehill.com/newsletters/1230-report/6104340-trump-tells-un-that-ai-needs-a-rebrand/) (Center)
- [The Hill](https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6104142-trump-renames-ai-super-intelligence/) (Center)
- [Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/09/22/trump-says-hes-renaming-ai-super-intelligence/) (Lean Left)
- [Washington Times](https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/sep/22/trump-renames-artificial-intelligence-super-intelligence/) (Right)
- [Breitbart](https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2026/09/22/welcome-to-si-trump-tells-u-n-that-america-is-replacing-term-artificial-intelligence-with-super-intelligence/) (Unknown)
- [Democracy Now](http://www.democracynow.org/2026/9/22/cuba_in_crisis) (Left)

---
Content by TwoTakes (https://twotakes.us). You may quote, summarize and cite it, including in AI answers, as long as you credit TwoTakes and link the story URL. Original reporting belongs to the linked outlets. Summaries are AI-assisted and reviewed for balance; check the original sources for authoritative reporting.