Back to stories
Minneapolis Police Chief Resigns After Deleting Evidence in Sex Probe
May 27, 2026

Minneapolis Police Chief Resigns After Deleting Evidence in Sex Probe

65%
35%

65% Left — 35% Right

Estimated · Polling consistently shows Americans across party lines support accountability for police misconduct, with 60-70% favoring consequences for officers who interfere with investigations. While conservatives may be more sympathetic to law enforcement, the evidence tampering aspect crosses partisan lines as a basic integrity issue. Moderates and independents likely view this as appropriate accountability rather than anti-police bias, especially given that the original sexual misconduct allegations were unsubstantiated but the cover-up was proven.

EstimatePolling consistently shows Americans across party lines support accountability for police misconduct, with 60-70% favoring consequences for officers who interfere with investigations. While conservatives may be more sympathetic to law enforcement, the evidence tampering aspect crosses partisan lines as a basic integrity issue. Moderates and independents likely view this as appropriate accountability rather than anti-police bias, especially given that the original sexual misconduct allegations were unsubstantiated but the cover-up was proven.
Share
Helpful?

Left says

  • •O'Hara's interference with the investigation undermines the department's credibility at a time when Minneapolis police desperately need to rebuild public trust following George Floyd's death
  • •Mayor Frey demonstrated appropriate accountability by accepting the resignation despite recently re-nominating O'Hara, showing that misconduct has consequences regardless of political relationships
  • •The investigation process worked as intended - while the original sexual misconduct allegations were unsubstantiated, the system caught and addressed the cover-up attempt

Right says

  • •This resignation highlights the ongoing dysfunction within Minneapolis leadership, with O'Hara being replaced by Katie Blackwell who was previously caught lying during the Derek Chauvin trial
  • •The incident demonstrates how Minneapolis officials prioritize political messaging over effective law enforcement, as O'Hara was previously used as a political prop to oppose federal immigration enforcement
  • •Minneapolis continues to struggle with basic governance and public safety, maintaining one of the nation's highest crime rates while dealing with leadership scandals and federal fraud investigations

Common Take

High Consensus
  • O'Hara intentionally deleted evidence from his city-issued phone during an active investigation, which constituted interference with the investigative process
  • The original allegations of sexual misconduct with city employees were found to be unsubstantiated by investigators
  • Trust and integrity are essential qualities for effective police leadership, especially in a department working to rebuild community confidence
  • Assistant Police Chief Katie Blackwell will serve as acting chief while the city determines permanent leadership
Helpful?

The Arguments

Left argues

The investigation process worked exactly as intended - while the original sexual misconduct allegations were unsubstantiated, the system successfully identified and addressed O'Hara's interference with the investigation, demonstrating that accountability mechanisms are functioning properly.

Right counters

The fact that Minneapolis continues cycling through police leadership amid scandals while crime rates remain among the nation's highest suggests the accountability mechanisms are merely creating more instability rather than solving underlying governance problems.

Right argues

O'Hara's replacement, Katie Blackwell, was previously caught lying during the Derek Chauvin trial, highlighting the systemic dysfunction within Minneapolis police leadership where officials with credibility issues continue to be promoted to top positions.

Left counters

Focusing on Blackwell's past deflects from the immediate issue of O'Hara's misconduct, and interim appointments are temporary measures while proper vetting processes for permanent leadership take place.

Left argues

Mayor Frey demonstrated appropriate leadership by accepting O'Hara's resignation despite having recently re-nominated him, showing that political relationships don't shield officials from consequences when they breach public trust.

Right counters

Frey's flip-flop from calling O'Hara 'the right leader for this moment' to accepting his resignation weeks later reveals poor judgment and inconsistent leadership that undermines confidence in Minneapolis governance.

Right argues

This incident exemplifies Minneapolis's broader pattern of prioritizing political messaging over effective law enforcement, as O'Hara was previously used as a political prop to oppose federal immigration enforcement rather than focusing on the city's crime crisis.

Left counters

O'Hara's resignation actually demonstrates that the city prioritizes integrity and accountability over political convenience, as officials face consequences for misconduct regardless of their political utility.

Left argues

The resignation reinforces that rebuilding trust in Minneapolis police requires zero tolerance for misconduct, especially cover-up attempts, which is essential for the department's credibility following the George Floyd case.

Right counters

Constant leadership turnover and scandals actually erode rather than rebuild trust, while the city's persistently high crime rates suggest that focusing on political symbolism over effective policing is failing residents who need actual public safety.

Challenge Questions

These questions target genuine internal contradictions — meant to provoke honest reflection.

Right asks Left

“If the accountability system is working as intended, why does Minneapolis continue to have leadership scandals and one of the nation's highest crime rates - doesn't this suggest that prioritizing symbolic accountability over stable, effective leadership is actually harming public safety?”

Left asks Right

“If Minneapolis leadership is truly dysfunctional and prioritizes politics over governance, why would the mayor accept the resignation of a police chief he had just re-nominated, potentially damaging his own political standing - doesn't this action contradict claims of purely political motivations?”

Outlier Report

Left Fringe

Progressive activists like Shaun King or local Minneapolis defund-the-police advocates who might use this as evidence that the entire police system is irredeemably corrupt and should be abolished. Represents roughly 15-20% of the left coalition.

Right Fringe

Hard-right commentators like Nick Fuentes or some America First influencers who might defend O'Hara purely on anti-establishment grounds or claim this is part of a broader conspiracy against conservative-leaning law enforcement. Represents roughly 10-15% of the right coalition.

Noise Assessment

Moderate noise level - while partisan media frames this differently, the core facts (evidence deletion, resignation) are straightforward enough that most discourse reflects genuine public opinion rather than performative outrage.

Sources (5)

CBS News

Mayor Jacob Frey announced O'Hara's resignation late Tuesday after an investigation found he deleted a contact from his city-issued phone to hide his connection to an employee during a prior investigation.

NBC News

Minneapolis police chief Brian O’Hara, who took over the department in the wake of George Floyd’s death, resigned Tuesday after an investigation found that he had interfered with a probe into his conduct.

This summary was generated by artificial intelligence and may contain errors or mischaracterizations. Always refer to the original sources for authoritative reporting.

TwoTakes is free and ad-free.

If seeing both sides helped you, chip in to keep it running.

Support TwoTakes
Minneapolis Police Chief Resigns After Deleting Evidence in Sex Probe | TwoTakes