Back to stories
Trump Gets 'Forever' IRS Audit Immunity From His Own DOJ
Intra-party splitMay 23, 2026

Trump Gets 'Forever' IRS Audit Immunity From His Own DOJ

65%
35%

65% Left — 35% Right

Estimated · Americans consistently show strong concern about conflicts of interest and self-dealing in government, with polling regularly showing majorities oppose officials using their positions for personal benefit. The optics of Trump suing his own government and then having his former personal lawyer grant him permanent tax immunity creates a clear appearance of corruption that resonates negatively with moderates and independents. While Trump's base sees this as correcting past weaponization, the broader public tends to view special exemptions for powerful figures skeptically.

Purple = 25% dissent within the right

EstimateAmericans consistently show strong concern about conflicts of interest and self-dealing in government, with polling regularly showing majorities oppose officials using their positions for personal benefit. The optics of Trump suing his own government and then having his former personal lawyer grant him permanent tax immunity creates a clear appearance of corruption that resonates negatively with moderates and independents. While Trump's base sees this as correcting past weaponization, the broader public tends to view special exemptions for powerful figures skeptically.
Share
Helpful?

Intra-Party Split Detected

Some conservative outlets like National Review criticize the settlement as 'unseemly' while others report it more neutrally

Left says

  • •Trump is using his presidential power to shield himself from tax investigations through his own Department of Justice, creating an unprecedented conflict of interest
  • •Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as Trump's personal criminal defense lawyer, signed the immunity agreement - raising serious ethical concerns about self-dealing
  • •The settlement allows Trump to sue the government he controls and then have his own administration grant him permanent protection from IRS scrutiny
  • •This arrangement violates democratic norms by placing the president above tax enforcement that applies to all other Americans

Right says

  • •The settlement resolves legitimate claims against government overreach and weaponization of federal agencies against political opponents
  • •Standard settlement practice includes mutual waivers to prevent either party from pursuing related claims that could undermine the agreement's purpose
  • •The $1.776 billion fund will compensate victims of politically motivated prosecutions, addressing systemic abuse of government power
  • •Trump faced years of excessive IRS auditing that appeared politically motivated, making this protection a reasonable remedy for past government misconduct

Common Take

High Consensus
  • Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche previously served as Trump's personal defense attorney before taking his current role
  • The settlement creates a $1.776 billion fund intended to compensate alleged victims of government weaponization
  • The IRS typically has a policy of automatically auditing sitting presidents and vice presidents annually
  • The expanded immunity clause was not included in the original settlement document released Monday
Helpful?

The Arguments

Left argues

Trump is using his presidential power to grant himself permanent immunity from tax enforcement through his own Department of Justice, creating an unprecedented conflict of interest where he can shield himself from the same laws that apply to all other Americans.

Right counters

This settlement resolves legitimate claims against years of excessive IRS auditing that appeared politically motivated, providing reasonable protection against future government overreach rather than creating blanket immunity from tax laws.

Right argues

Standard settlement practice includes mutual waivers to prevent either party from pursuing related claims that could undermine the agreement's purpose, and the $1.776 billion fund addresses systemic abuse of government power against political opponents.

Left counters

No standard settlement involves a president suing the government he controls and then having his own administration grant him 'forever' protection from federal tax enforcement - this is self-dealing disguised as legal process.

Left argues

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as Trump's personal criminal defense lawyer, signed the immunity agreement, creating serious ethical concerns about a former personal attorney now using government power to protect his former client.

Right counters

The settlement addresses legitimate grievances about weaponized federal agencies, and having experienced legal counsel who understands the issues ensures proper resolution of government misconduct claims.

Right argues

The IRS has a history of conducting politically motivated audits against Trump, making protection from future harassment a reasonable remedy for documented government abuse rather than special treatment.

Left counters

The IRS has a mandatory policy of auditing all presidents and vice presidents annually, and reports show Trump's audits were actually delayed during his first term - this immunity prevents legitimate oversight of the nation's highest office.

Left argues

This arrangement violates democratic norms by placing the president above tax enforcement laws, with federal code explicitly prohibiting presidents from directing the IRS to terminate audits against any taxpayer.

Right counters

The Attorney General appears to be legally excluded from restrictions on IRS interference, and this settlement prevents future abuse of tax enforcement as a political weapon against elected officials.

Challenge Questions

These questions target genuine internal contradictions — meant to provoke honest reflection.

Right asks Left

“If this settlement is truly about preventing government overreach, why does it only protect Trump and his family rather than establishing broader protections for all Americans against politically motivated IRS investigations?”

Left asks Right

“If Trump's IRS audits were truly legitimate and not politically motivated, why did the Democratic-controlled House Ways and Means Committee find that his presidential audits were significantly delayed during his first term?”

Outlier Report

Left Fringe

Progressive activists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and groups like Justice Democrats who frame this as grounds for immediate impeachment or constitutional crisis, representing roughly 15% of the left coalition.

Right Fringe

MAGA influencers like Steve Bannon and Laura Loomer who celebrate this as Trump 'owning the deep state' and want similar protections extended to all Trump allies, representing about 20% of the right coalition.

Noise Assessment

Moderate noise level - while partisan media amplifies the story significantly, the core conflict of interest concerns reflect genuine public sentiment rather than manufactured outrage.

Sources (5)

AllSides

The Department of Justice released a settlement addendum Tuesday permanently barring the IRS from auditing the past tax returns of President Donald Trump and his adult sons, just one day after the administration unveiled a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" geared toward alleged victims of government abuse. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed the one-page order, which states the IRS "releases, waives, acquits" any pending claims against Trump, his family, or the Trump Organization and is "forever barred and precluded" from pursuing claims tied to tax returns filed before Monday's settlement agreement...

Axios

<p>A settlement between President Trump and the IRS that created a $1.8 billion "<a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/05/18/trump-irs-lawsuit-dropped" target="_blank">anti-weaponization</a>" fund was expanded Tuesday to bar investigations into him, his family and his businesses' previously filed tax returns.</p><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> The expanded waiver intensifies scrutiny of a controversial settlement involving agencies that <a href="https://www.axios.com/politics-policy/donald-trump" target="_blank">Trump</a> effectively oversees.</p><hr /><p><strong>What's inside: </strong>The one-page <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1441216/dl" target="_blank">document</a> says the IRS is "forever barred and precluded" from prosecuting or pursuing any and all claims related to the plaintiff or affiliated individuals.</p><ul><li>The waiver says the restrictions apply to "tax returns filed before the effective date" of the agreement, which was Monday.</li></ul><p><strong>What they're saying:</strong> "As is customary in settlements, both sides have executed waivers of a variety of claims that were or could have been brought," a Justice Department spokesperson told Axios in an emailed statement.</p><ul><li>"There would be little point in settling several significant claims if either party could simply turn around and seek to initiative [sic] more adverse claims that could have been pursued previously."</li></ul><p><strong>Between the lines:</strong> The expanded settlement was not included in the Justice Department's initial nine-page agreement released Monday, nor was it signed by the same parties.</p><ul><li>Tuesday's waiver is signed by Acting Attorney General <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/02/trump-todd-blanche-acting-attorney-general" target="_blank">Todd Blanche</a>, who previously served as Trump's personal lawyer in several cases, including his New York<a href="https://www.axios.com/2023/04/04/trump-hush-money-case-key-players" target="_blank"> criminal fraud trial</a>.</li><li>Monday's agreement was signed by the CEO of the IRS, Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward and Trump's legal counsel.</li></ul><p><strong>The intrigue: </strong>Most federal officials, including the president, cannot stop the IRS from pursuing specific investigations.</p><ul><li>However, the attorney general appears to be <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7217" target="_blank">excluded</a> from that restriction. </li></ul><p><strong>Catch up quick:</strong> The settlement was reached after Trump dropped his <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/01/30/trump-tax-returns-irs-treasury-department" target="_blank">suit against the IRS</a> after a former contractor leaked his confidential tax returns to members of the media.</p><ul><li>Instead of receiving a direct payout, attorneys for the president settled to create a $1.776 billion fund to compensate those who were targets of political "weaponization," or who faced prosecutions for political aims.</li><li>The decision sparked outrage from critics who said it was unusual for the president to pursue damages from an agency he controls.</li></ul><p><strong>Zoom in:</strong> Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y) told Axios in an emailed statement that Trump is handing himself a "get-out-of-jail-free card."</p><ul><li>"He sued the government he runs, had his own DOJ settle the case and pocketed the prize: special IRS protection for the Trump family. That is self-dealing with a government seal," he said.</li><li>"Republicans' silence says it all: nothing for taxpayers, nothing for families — just payouts, protection, and special treatment for Trump."</li></ul><p><strong>Go deeper:</strong> <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/05/18/trump-irs-lawsuit-dropped" target="_blank">Trump creates $1.8B "anti-weaponization" fund after dropping IRS suit</a></p><p><em>Editor's note: This story and headline have been corrected to note that the settlement ends any pending audits of Trump's tax returns. (It does not prevent future audits.)</em></p>

Forbes

An expanded settlement agreement was signed by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and posted on the Justice Department’s website on Tuesday.

National Review

This is such an unseemly arrangement that it was omitted from the settlement document. <img src="https://i0.wp.com/www.nationalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/trump-blanche.jpg?fit=617%2C360&#038;ssl=1" />

The Hill

CNBC&#8217;s &#8220;Squawk Box&#8221; co-host Joe Kernen said Friday that President Trump&#8217;s settlement with his own administration for suing the IRS for $10 billion &#8220;smells bad.&#8221; Trump dropped the lawsuit to launch the $1.776 billion &#8220;anti-weaponization&#8221; fund to compensate those who claim they have been wrongly investigated or prosecuted by the Department of Justice (DOJ). Acting&#8230;

This summary was generated by artificial intelligence and may contain errors or mischaracterizations. Always refer to the original sources for authoritative reporting.

TwoTakes is free and ad-free.

If seeing both sides helped you, chip in to keep it running.

Support TwoTakes
Trump Gets 'Forever' IRS Audit Immunity From His Own DOJ | TwoTakes