The Kennedy Center under renovation, with restricted area signage on fencing.Trump Invokes Executive Privilege to Hide Kennedy Center Records
Intra-Party Split Detected
A bitter internal feud between Trump allies Alina Habba and Ric Grenell over alleged missing Kennedy Center donation funds exposes infighting within Trump's inner circle, separate from the broader executive privilege dispute with Democrats.
Left says
- •Extending executive privilege to conversations with advisers who hold no government position marks an unusually broad legal claim that could shield virtually any outside influence on federal decisions from oversight.
- •A sitting congresswoman serving as an ex officio trustee is being blocked from obtaining information relevant to her lawsuit over the closure, demolition and renaming of a publicly chartered institution.
- •The Kennedy Center is not a private club but a federally created cultural institution, so communications about its operations and potential demolition arguably belong in the public record, not behind a privilege shield.
- •The emerging allegations of millions in missing donor money and infighting among Trump's own advisers suggest the secrecy claim may also be convenient for avoiding scrutiny of financial mismanagement at the center.
Right says
- •As chairman of the Kennedy Center board and the official who appoints its trustees, the president has a legitimate official interest in confidential deliberations about the center's management and direction.
- •Presidents have long relied on candid advice from trusted confidants, including those outside formal government roles, and compelling disclosure of those conversations could chill honest counsel on any administration's priorities.
- •The lawsuit is being driven by a political opponent of the renovation plan, and the privilege claim is a standard legal tool to protect deliberative communications from being weaponized in litigation.
- •Separately, the internal dispute over an alleged missing donation is an unresolved personnel and financial matter that officials say may stem from miscommunication rather than any wrongdoing tied to the privilege claim itself.
Common Take
High Consensus- The White House has formally invoked executive privilege to withhold certain Trump communications in Rep. Joyce Beatty's lawsuit over the Kennedy Center's planned closure and renovation.
- The privilege claim is unusual in that it extends to conversations with non-government advisers, including figures like Howard Lutnick and Matt Floca.
- The case centers on disputed plans to close the Kennedy Center for renovations, potentially rename it, and the extent of Trump's authority over the institution as board chairman.
- Questions about financial transparency at the Kennedy Center, including a reported dispute over a multimillion-dollar donation, have added public scrutiny to the center's operations.
The Arguments
Left argues
Extending executive privilege to cover conversations with non-government advisers is an unusually expansive legal claim that could shield virtually any outside influence on federal decisions from accountability.
Right counters
Presidents have always relied on informal advisers, and if privilege only covered official staff, outside counsel would simply avoid candor, undermining the quality of advice presidents receive.
Right argues
As the Kennedy Center's board chairman with statutory authority to appoint trustees, Trump has a legitimate official interest in confidential deliberations about the center's management, making privilege a reasonable tool rather than an abuse.
Left counters
The Kennedy Center is a federally chartered public institution, not a private corporation, so its governance communications arguably belong in the public record rather than behind a privilege shield designed for core presidential functions.
Left argues
A sitting congresswoman serving as an ex officio trustee is being denied information directly relevant to her lawsuit over the center's closure and potential demolition, raising serious questions about transparency in the use of a taxpayer-linked institution.
Right counters
The lawsuit is being pursued by a political opponent of the renovation plan, and compelling disclosure of deliberative conversations would set a precedent allowing litigation to be used as a tool to pry open any administration's internal decision-making.
Left argues
The timing of the privilege claim, alongside emerging allegations of millions in missing donor funds and infighting among Trump's own advisers, suggests the secrecy may conveniently also shield financial mismanagement from scrutiny.
Right counters
Officials have stressed the missing-donation dispute is a separate, unresolved personnel matter that may stem from miscommunication rather than wrongdoing, and conflating it with the legal privilege claim is speculative.
Right argues
Requiring presidents to disclose candid conversations with trusted non-government confidants risks chilling honest counsel across any administration, not just this one, which is why privilege claims of this kind are a standard legal safeguard.
Left counters
If privilege can be stretched to cover virtually any adviser regardless of government status, the exception could swallow the rule, leaving almost no outside influence on federal decisions subject to oversight.
Challenge Questions
These questions target genuine internal contradictions — meant to provoke honest reflection.
Right asks Left
“If executive privilege should never extend to conversations about a federally chartered institution, how would any president protect candid advice on matters involving public-private bodies like the Kennedy Center, the Smithsonian, or federal advisory boards?”
Left asks Right
“If the Kennedy Center's governance is treated as covered by executive privilege whenever the president acts as board chairman, what principled limit prevents that logic from extending to any other board or institution a president happens to chair or influence?”
Outlier Report
Left Fringe
Figures like Rep. Joyce Beatty and transparency advocates (e.g., watchdog groups like CREW - Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) push an aggressive anti-privilege stance, framing this as emblematic of broader Trump authoritarianism; they represent maybe 15-20% of the left but get outsized media attention.
Right Fringe
Pro-Trump commentators like Mike Cernovich or MAGA-aligned pundits on X dismiss the entire story as a partisan ex officio Democrat's lawsuit and downplay the missing-money allegations as irrelevant infighting, representing perhaps 15% of the right but amplified in conservative media circles.
Sources (6)
A White House lawyer said Trump's executive privilege would also cover his conversations with advisers who don't serve in government.
<p>President <a href="https://www.axios.com/politics-policy/donald-trump" target="_blank">Trump</a> has directed his White House counsel to examine explosive allegations dropped on him Friday in the Oval Office:</p><ul><li>Former Trump attorney <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/12/08/trump-attorney-new-jersey-lawyer-alina-habba" target="_blank">Alina Habba</a> told the president that another one of his top advisers — former Kennedy Center leader <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/03/13/grenell-kennedy-center-president-renovation" target="_blank">Ric Grenell</a> — failed to deposit a multimillion-dollar donation that her billionaire husband made to the center a year ago, according to four senior administration officials and three insiders briefed on the controversy.</li><li>Grenell denied the accusations as "absurd" and a "lie." </li><li>Habba and her husband, Turhan Mildon, declined to comment through a spokesperson.</li></ul><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> The extraordinary row between the two top-tier presidential advisers and former allies provides a rare and acrimonious behind-the-scenes glimpse into the intersection of power, influence and money in Trump's Washington.</p><hr /><ul><li>The total value of the contribution in question: nearly $6 million, White House sources said Habba told them.</li><li>A senior administration official cautioned that "these are only allegations. We don't know if they're true. This could be a misunderstanding."</li><li>Said another: "POTUS doesn't want to deal with this. Of course, he's concerned. But if there is missing money, this is a big, big problem."</li></ul><p><strong>Just a few months ago</strong>, Grenell was friends with Mildon and Habba. But he was notably absent from<strong> </strong>their $10 million wedding that was attended by Trump world officials, power brokers and luminaries last month.</p><ul><li>"This is the ultimate MAGA blood feud," said one Trump world insider with knowledge of the conflict.</li></ul><p><strong>Zoom in:</strong> The dispute grew out of a friendship between Grenell and Mildon, sources familiar with the conflict say. The men had mutual interests in Venezuela in early 2025, immediately after Trump returned to the White House.</p><ul><li>Grenell, as a Trump special envoy, was advocating for normalizing U.S. relations with Venezuela's leader at the time, Nicolas Maduro.</li><li>Mildon, a Turkish national, had extensive Venezuelan business interests that were threatened by Secretary of State Marco Rubio's hardline pressure campaign targeting Maduro.</li></ul><p><strong>The intrigue:</strong> In the spring of 2025, Grenell persuaded Mildon to include a multimillion-dollar Kennedy Center donation in a lump-sum $17.6 million payment for a business deal involving a U.S. company, Habba told the president and White House staffers, two sources said.</p><ul><li>Habba's attorneys plan to give the White House documentation — reviewed by Axios — to support her allegations about Grenell soliciting a Kennedy Center donation from Mildon to go to a private company in the spring of 2025.</li><li>"The White House counsel has asked for documents and proof. None has come so far," a White House official said.</li></ul><p><strong>Grenell called the statements</strong> from Habba to Trump "Absurd. I've never asked for one cent to be sent somewhere else pretending it was for the Kennedy Center, and I've never received any payment from him at all. Make him give proof to what he is saying, not make these absurd allegations."</p><ul><li>When Habba initially leveled her accusations against Grenell, she said the total amount of the Kennedy Center contribution was $17 million, the sources said. But as she learned of the specifics from her husband, she said the amount of the contribution in question was $5.6 million. </li><li>"This has been hard to track because numbers have changed," the White House official said.</li></ul><p><strong>After making his alleged contribution</strong>, Mildon never checked to see if it was deposited. He believed it had been credited because he was treated like a VIP donor at the Kennedy Center, where he met Habba in late 2025 before their whirlwind romance and marriage, those sources said.</p><p><strong>Friction point: </strong>Mildon and Habba, the sources said, discovered the issue after their business relationship frayed with Grenell, who lost an internal administration power struggle with Rubio that culminated in the U.S. seizing Maduro on Jan. 3 and taking him to New York City to face narcotics charges.</p><ul><li>In June, Maduro's successor, Delcy Rodriguez, issued an order revoking one of Mildon's company contracts to operate state-owned cement plants in Venezuela, the New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/12/us/politics/a-trump-loyalist-a-turkish-investor-and-a-battle-for-wealth-and-influence.html" target="_blank">reported</a> Monday. A source familiar with the situation told Axios this summer that her action was partly due to the U.S. government's prodding.</li><li>Rodriguez then reversed herself, the Times reported, after learning of Mildon's new relationship with Habba because the Venezuelan leader believed Mildon therefore had Trump's backing.</li><li>Amid the Times' reporting into Mildon's contract, Habba discovered that Mildon's supposed donation never made it to the Kennedy Center, the sources said.</li></ul><p><strong>Inside the room:</strong> Habba then headed to the White House last Friday to tell the president about the situation.</p><ul><li>"Alina hit the roof" when her husband told her that he hadn't donated the money directly to the Kennedy Center, whose records indicate that Mildon actually owed a $270,000 pledged donation.</li><li>There was no record of Mildon giving anything close to $5.6 million, officials said. Mildon on Tuesday paid the $270,000, records show, to the Kennedy Center.</li></ul><p><strong>In partial confirmation of Habba's story</strong>, Kennedy Center staff reported that late last year there was a search for Mildon's contribution — then thought to be $6 million — but that it couldn't be found, an official said.</p><ul><li>But Lisa Dale, who handled finances for the Kennedy Center then, said the only record in her books connected to Mildon showed he owed $270,000. "There was nothing about $6 million," she told Axios. "I would have heard about that."</li></ul><p><strong>Context: </strong>Habba and Grenell trace their roots to Trump's first administration.</p><ul><li>Grenell was Trump's ambassador to Germany and then his acting director of national intelligence. Habba was Trump's private attorney and briefly was U.S. attorney in New Jersey during this term.</li></ul><p><strong>Between the lines:</strong> The Kennedy Center has been an ongoing sore spot for Trump, beset by controversy over his efforts to put his name on the building and fundraising woes.</p><ul><li>If Habba's allegations of missing money are true, it could prove particularly galling to Trump, who views the center and its fundraising personally.</li><li>Those who know the president's thinking say he is particularly disapproving of people who use his name or misuse positions he has given them. His dismissal Tuesday of Ambassador to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle was the latest reminder of that.</li><li>Two<strong> </strong>top Trump world figures being engaged in such a bitter feud adds to the complexity.</li><li>"Nobody wants to get in the middle of Alina Habba and Ric Grenell going to war," one official said.</li></ul>
A three-judge panel appeared unconvinced by claims that a federal law requiring the president to preserve and hand over his presidential papers was unconstitutional.
The White House is asserting executive privilege to block some records of President Trump’s communications from being shared in an ongoing lawsuit over the future of the Kennedy Center. Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio), an ex officio board member who is challenging plans to close the performing arts center for renovations and add Trump’s name to…
This year's total spending may exceed the $11.2 billion spent during the 2024 presidential election cycle.
The White House has invoked executive privilege to shield certain records of President Trump's communications from being shared with Rep. Joyce Beatty as part of her legal challenge against plans to close the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts for two years.