Trump threatens Iran infrastructure strikes as peace talks resume
Intra-Party Split Detected
Some MAGA base voices like Tucker Carlson side skeptical of war, while Trump leans toward hawkish figures praising military action
Left says
- •Trump's threats to destroy civilian infrastructure like power plants and bridges represent dangerous escalation that could harm innocent Iranian civilians
- •The economic blockade is already causing severe humanitarian consequences for ordinary Iranians who have no role in government decisions
- •Diplomatic solutions require patience and good faith negotiations, not ultimatums and threats of massive military strikes
- •The administration's aggressive rhetoric undermines the peace process and makes Iranian negotiators less likely to compromise
Right says
- •Iran violated the ceasefire by firing on ships in the Strait of Hormuz, demonstrating bad faith in negotiations
- •Strong pressure through blockades and credible military threats is necessary to force Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program
- •Iran's closure of the vital shipping lane is economic extortion that hurts global energy supplies and must be stopped
- •Previous administrations failed to confront Iran for 47 years, allowing the regime to become a regional threat that must finally be addressed
Common Take
High Consensus- Both sides acknowledge that direct negotiations between the US and Iran are taking place in Pakistan
- The current two-week ceasefire is set to expire on April 21, creating urgency for reaching an agreement
- The Strait of Hormuz closure is disrupting global shipping and energy markets significantly
- A comprehensive peace deal would need to address Iran's nuclear program and regional conflicts
The Arguments
Right argues
Iran violated the ceasefire by firing on ships in the Strait of Hormuz and closing this vital waterway, demonstrating they negotiate in bad faith while using economic extortion against the global community.
Left counters
The U.S. maintains its own blockade of Iranian ports while demanding Iran open the strait, creating an asymmetric arrangement that Iran reasonably views as unfair and economically devastating to their country.
Left argues
Trump's threats to destroy civilian infrastructure like power plants and bridges would harm innocent Iranian civilians who have no role in government decisions, potentially constituting war crimes under international law.
Right counters
Iran's nuclear program and regional aggression pose existential threats that require credible deterrence, and previous diplomatic approaches without pressure have failed for 47 years to prevent Iran from becoming a destabilizing force.
Right argues
The economic blockade is forcing Iran to negotiate seriously for the first time, as evidenced by their willingness to engage in direct talks, proving that maximum pressure tactics work where diplomacy alone has failed.
Left counters
Economic warfare that causes humanitarian suffering undermines the moral authority needed for sustainable peace negotiations and makes Iranian leaders less likely to make concessions that could be seen as capitulating to coercion.
Left argues
Trump's aggressive ultimatums and public threats create domestic political pressure on Iranian leaders that makes compromise appear as weakness, potentially sabotaging the very negotiations he claims to want.
Right counters
Iran only responds to strength and has historically used diplomatic engagement as a stalling tactic while advancing their nuclear program, making clear consequences necessary to achieve genuine denuclearization.
Right argues
Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupts 20% of global oil supplies and threatens the world economy, justifying strong measures to reopen this international waterway that affects all nations.
Left counters
The U.S. blockade of Iranian ports initiated this crisis and continues to strangle Iran's economy, making their response a defensive measure rather than unprovoked aggression against international commerce.
Challenge Questions
These questions target genuine internal contradictions — meant to provoke honest reflection.
Right asks Left
“If diplomatic solutions require patience and good faith as you argue, how do you reconcile supporting negotiations with a regime that has consistently violated international agreements, funds terrorist organizations, and has now broken the current ceasefire by attacking civilian vessels?”
Left asks Right
“If maximum pressure and credible military threats are necessary to force Iranian compliance as you argue, why do you simultaneously claim to want successful negotiations when such coercive tactics historically make adversaries less willing to make the concessions needed for lasting peace agreements?”
Outlier Report
Left Fringe
Progressive anti-war activists like CodePink's Medea Benjamin and some Squad members like Rashida Tlaib who oppose any military threats against Iran and frame all sanctions as collective punishment. They represent roughly 15-20% of the left coalition.
Right Fringe
Hardline hawks like Senator Tom Cotton and commentator Mark Levin who advocate for immediate regime change in Iran rather than negotiations, representing about 25-30% of the right coalition who see any diplomacy as weakness.
Noise Assessment
Moderate noise levels - while both sides have vocal extremes, the core debate reflects genuine public disagreement about diplomatic versus pressure tactics rather than performative positioning.
Sources (15)
President Donald Trump said the U.S.-Iran war is "very close" to an end as hostilities ease amid a two-week ceasefire agreement. "I think it's close to over, yeah. I view it as very close to being over," Trump told FOX Business anchor Maria Bartiromo in an interview that will air on "Mornings with Maria" on Wednesday.
<p>President Trump told Axios that U.S. and Iranian negotiators will probably meet this weekend, and he expects them to hammer out a final <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/17/iran-us-deal-20-billion-frozen-funds-uranium" target="_blank">deal to end the war</a>. </p><p><strong>Reality check: </strong>Multiple U.S. officials and other sources briefed on the negotiations have told Axios that while significant progress has been made and the U.S. and <a href="https://www.axios.com/world/iran" target="_blank">Iran</a> are now closing in on a three-page peace plan, gaps still remain on critical issues.</p><hr /><ul><li>Trump, who has claimed to have personally spoken with the Iranians in recent days, is clearly feeling optimistic.</li><li>"The Iranians want to meet. They want to make a deal. I think a meeting will probably take place over the weekend. I think we will get a deal in the next day or two," he said in a brief phone interview.</li></ul><p><strong>Driving the news:</strong> Axios reported on Friday that one element of the deal under discussion would have the U.S. release $20 billion in frozen Iranian funds in return for Iran giving up its stockpile of enriched uranium.</p><ul><li>The plan also involves a moratorium on Iranian enrichment.</li></ul><p><strong>What they're saying:</strong> Trump said he's not going to lift the naval blockade before a deal is reached, and he stressed he wants the Strait of Hormuz to be open for everybody.</p><ul><li>Iran announced on Friday that it would open the strait for the remainder of the ceasefire, which ends on April 21, but the details of how that will work remain unclear.</li></ul><p><strong>The big picture:</strong> Trump said the deal will "make Israel safe" and stressed "Israel is going to come out great" at the end of the war. </p><ul><li>At the same time, he made clear he wants Israeli strikes on Lebanon to end as part of the ceasefire that was announced on Thursday. </li><li>"Israel has to stop. They can't continue to blow buildings up. I am not gonna allow it," he said. </li></ul><p><strong>What to watch: </strong>On Friday evening, shortly before the interview, an Israeli drone conducted a strike in southern Lebanon. </p><ul><li>Some in the Israeli government oppose a deal and want to continue the wars in Iran and in Lebanon, though that likely won't be possible as long as Trump opposes it.</li></ul>
<p>U.S. and <a href="https://www.axios.com/world/iran" target="_blank">Iranian</a> negotiators made progress in talks on Tuesday, moving closer to a framework agreement to end the war, two U.S. officials said.</p><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> The two adversaries — with the assistance of Pakistani, Egyptian and Turkish mediators — have been <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/13/us-iran-nuclear-talks-ceasefire-deal" target="_blank">trying to bridge remaining gaps</a> and reach a deal before the ceasefire expires on April 21.</p><hr /><ul><li>A Pakistani delegation headed by Army commander Field Marshal Asim Munir arrived in Tehran on Wednesday for talks with Iranian officials.</li><li>U.S. officials and sources familiar with the mediation cautioned that a deal is not guaranteed, given the substantial differences between the two sides.</li><li>"Lets wait and see if we can get a deal. We are hopeful and accordingly trying to push with both sides," a Pakistani official said. </li></ul><p><strong>Behind the scenes:</strong> A U.S. official said President Trump's negotiating team — Vice President Vance, White House envoy Steve Witkoff and senior adviser Jared Kushner — continued making calls and exchanging draft proposals with the Iranians and mediators Tuesday.</p><ul><li>"They were on the phone and backchanneling with all the countries and they are getting closer," the U.S. official said.</li><li>A second U.S. official confirmed progress was made Tuesday.</li><li>"We want to make a deal. And parts of their government want to make a deal. Now the trick is to get the whole of government over there to make the deal," a third U.S. official said. </li></ul><p><strong>State of play:</strong> A new round of direct in-person talks will likely take place in the coming days before the ceasefire expires, U.S. officials and sources familiar with the mediation said, but no date has been set.</p><ul><li>Vance, who led the initial talks in Pakistan last week, said at a Turning Point USA event in Georgia Tuesday: "I think the people we're sitting across from wanted to make a deal. ... I feel very good about where we are."</li><li>Vance's comment is telling because the vice president was not negotiating directly with Iran's supreme leader, <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/08/exclusive-how-irans-supreme-leader-reached-a-truce-with-trump" target="_blank">Mojtaba Khamenei</a>.</li></ul><p><strong>The latest: </strong>White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a briefing with reporters that the U.S. remains engaged in the negotiations with Iran.</p><ul><li>"These conversations are productive. We feels good about the prospects of a deal. it is in the best interests of Iran to meet the President's demands," Leavitt said.</li></ul><p><strong>Between the lines:</strong> If a framework agreement is reached, the ceasefire would need to be extended to negotiate the details of a comprehensive deal, a U.S. official and a source familiar with the mediation said.</p><ul><li>"The details are complicated — you can't do that in two days," one U.S. official said.</li><li>"The U.S. has not formally agreed to an extension of the ceasefire. There is continued engagement between the U.S. and Iran to reach a deal," a second U.S. official said.</li></ul><p><strong>Zoom in:</strong> U.S. officials say Trump's naval blockade — which has cut off Iran's oil exports — and the country's deepening economic crisis are increasing pressure on Tehran to reach a deal.</p><ul><li>"Iran has no money. They're broke. We know it. And they know we know it," one U.S. official said.</li></ul><p><strong>By the numbers</strong>: Iran exports about 1.5 million barrels of oil daily, earning roughly $140 million.</p><ul><li>"A blockade zeroes this out overnight," said <a href="https://x.com/miadmaleki/status/2043456538505883917" target="_blank">Miad Maleki</a>, a former Iran sanctions expert at the Treasury Department and now a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.</li><li>Kharg Island, which handles about 90% of Iran's oil, sits 400 miles away from the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf and would effectively shut down under the blockade.</li><li>"We don't need to invade Kharg right now. We can just strangle it," another administration official said.</li></ul><p><strong>Zoom out</strong>: If Iran can't export oil and runs out of onshore storage, it will have to halt pumping — potentially taking wells offline and causing long-term economic damage, administration officials said.</p><ul><li>"What does it say if Iran, a country the world knows for its oil, can't produce oil? It's going to be worse than Venezuela under Maduro," one official said.</li></ul><p><strong>Before the war, </strong>Iran's economy was already under severe strain from Trump's maximum pressure sanctions campaign, which drove high unemployment, gasoline shortages and food inflation. The war deepened the crisis.</p><ul><li>U.S. and Israeli airstrikes have shuttered Iran's two largest steel plants and brought its petrochemical industry to a standstill.</li><li>Sepah Bank — Iran's state-run financial institution that pays military and IRGC salaries — is under frequent cyberattack from Israeli hackers, and its digital security center was struck in a <a href="https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603119442" target="_blank">missile attack</a> last month.</li><li>Iran's internet shutdown, now in its 47th day, is costing the economy an additional $50 million daily.</li></ul>
President Trump threatened attacks on bridges and power plants if Iran did not accept a deal.
Trump: “We’re offering a very fair and reasonable DEAL, and I hope they take it because, if they don’t, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!“
President Trump’s Middle East envoy is headed to Pakistan this week to restart negotiations to end the Iran War, the commander-in-chief told The Post Sunday.
Neither the US or Iran — nor mediator Pakistan — have publicly confirmed that Washington and Tehran will again meet for further peace talks to end the seven-week-long war, but the signs of an impending gathering are stacking up.
After Iran again closed the Strait of Hormuz, President Trump said the U.S. is returning to Pakistan for negotiations, but threatened to strike Iranian infrastructure if a deal isn't reached soon.
President Trump sprinted ahead Friday to take a victory lap celebrating what he said was Iran’s agreement to open the Strait of Hormuz and a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon. But conflicting statements from Iranian officials and Israeli pushback on the terms of the ceasefire with Lebanon are raising doubt about the president’s actual successes. …
<p>President Trump said his envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner will travel to Islamabad on Sunday for another round of negotiations with <a href="https://www.axios.com/world/iran" target="_blank">Iran</a> before the ceasefire is scheduled to end on Tuesday.</p><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> The talks will be an eleventh hour attempt to reach a deal, at least to extend the ceasefire if not to end the war.</p><hr /><p><strong>Driving the news:</strong> Iran attacked several commercial vessels on Saturday after announcing it was once again <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/18/iran-closes-strait-of-hormuz-once-again-fires-on-tankers" target="_blank">closing the Strait</a> of Hormuz.</p><ul><li>That came after Trump had expressed confidence that a peace deal was imminent.</li><li>The Iranian move came after Trump declined to lift the blockade on the strait of Hormuz, and after Tehran claimed the U.S. introduced new "maximalist" positions.</li><li>Trump convened an <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/18/iran-trump-white-house-hormuz" target="_blank">unusual Saturday Situation Room meeting</a> in response to the new crisis. A U.S. official said that at the end of the meeting Trump still expressed a desire to try reach a deal with Iran, before exploring other options. </li></ul><p><strong>What he is saying:</strong> "Iran decided to fire bullets yesterday in the Strait of Hormuz — A Total Violation of our Ceasefire Agreement!" Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday morning. </p><ul><li>Trump noted his representatives would arrive in Islamabad on Monday evening for negotiations.</li><li>"We’re offering a very fair and reasonable DEAL, and I hope they take it because, if they don’t, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!" Trump wrote.</li><li>"They’ll come down fast, they’ll come down easy and, if they don’t take the DEAL, it will be my Honor to do what has to be done, which should have been done to Iran, by other Presidents, for the last 47 years. IT’S TIME FOR THE IRAN KILLING MACHINE TO END!" he added.</li></ul><p><strong>The bottom line: </strong>After days of assuring the U.S. and the world that the war was over, Trump could soon revert back to his threats to escalate it if the Islamabad talks fail.</p>
<p>The U.S. and <a href="https://www.axios.com/world/iran" target="_blank">Iran</a> didn't reach an agreement during marathon negotiations on Saturday in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> The deadlock in <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/11/us-iran-negotiations-pakistan" target="_blank">the talks</a> puts the two-week ceasefire agreed last week in limbo, with the possibility of renewed and escalating warfare.</p><hr /><ul><li>According to a source briefed on the talks, some of the disagreements had to do with Iran's demand to control the Strait of Hormuz and refusal to give up on its enriched uranium stockpile.</li></ul><p><strong>What he's saying: </strong>Vice President Vance said the U.S. and Iran had "substantive discussions" over 21 hours but couldn't bridge the gaps.</p><ul><li>"This is bad news for Iran much more than this is bad new for the U.S.," he stressed. "We have made very clear what our red lines are…and they have chosen not to accept our terms."</li><li>Vance said the U.S. wanted to a long-term "affirmative commitment" from Iran not to seek a nuclear weapon or the tools that would enable them to produce one quickly. "We haven't seen that yet, we hope that we will," he said. </li><li>Vance claimed the U.S. was "quite flexible and accommodating" and negotiated "in good faith" but couldn't make significant progress. </li><li>Immediately after the four-minute press conference, Vance departed Islamabad for Washington. </li></ul><p><strong>The other side: </strong>Several Iranian media outlets said after Vance's press conference that the talks failed because the U.S. side was not realistic and had "excessive demands."</p><p><strong>Behind the scenes: </strong>The U.S. and Iranian delegations met over several rounds in multiple formats. The talks began on Saturday and ended in the early hours of Sunday local time.</p><ul><li>Vance said the U.S. negotiating team spoke with President Trump at least half-a-dozen times during the day. </li><li>They also spoke with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and CENTCOM commander Amd. Brad Cooper.</li></ul><p><strong>Between the lines:</strong> No one expected a final agreement on Saturday, but the U.S. side hoped for sufficient momentum to keep negotiating, even if that meant extending the ceasefire.</p><ul><li>Vance's brief remarks conveyed little such optimism, though he did not say the U.S. was walking away.</li></ul><p><strong>What to watch: </strong>"We leave here with a very simple proposal. A method of understanding that is our final and best offer. We will see if the Iranians accept it," Vance said. </p><p><em>This is a breaking news story and will be updated.</em></p>
<p>Direct negotiations between the U.S. and <a href="https://www.axios.com/world/iran" target="_blank">Iran</a>, mediated by Pakistan, began in Islamabad on Saturday, according to a White House official. </p><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> While the <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/08/us-iran-peace-talks-vance-pakistan-saturday" target="_self">meeting itself</a> is historic — the highest-level engagement between U.S. and Iranian officials since 1979 — the chances for success appear low. Both sides know the risk of failure is renewed war, but have clashing visions for peace.</p><hr /><p><strong>Driving the news: </strong>"The U.S., Pakistan and Iran are holding a trilateral face to face meetings today in Islamabad," the White House official said. </p><ul><li>The U.S. delegation for the talks is headed by Vice President JD Vance and includes also White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner. </li><li>"A full suite of U.S. experts on relevant subject areas are present in Islamabad. Additional experts are supporting from Washington", the White House official said. </li></ul><p><strong>The Iranian delegation</strong> is headed by Speaker of Parliament Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and includes Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.</p><ul><li>Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar are also attending the talks.</li><li>Before the direct negotiations started Saturday, each of the delegations exchanged messages directly though separate meetings with<strong> </strong>Sharif.</li></ul><p><strong>What they are saying: </strong>Iranian media reported that the Iranian delegation agreed to hold the direct talks after the indirect talks made progress and after Iran received assurances that Israel would restrain its strikes on Beirut and southern Lebanon. It is unclear if such a commitment was given by Israel.</p><ul><li>The Iranian press also claimed the U.S. agreed to release frozen Iranian funds, but a U.S. official denied that.</li></ul><p><em>This is a breaking news story and will be updated </em></p>
<p>Vice President <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/03/27/vance-iran-peace-talks" target="_blank">Vance</a> left Friday for Pakistan and the biggest challenge of his career: negotiating a deal with <a href="https://www.axios.com/world/iran" target="_blank">Iran</a> to solve the nuclear dispute and end the war.</p><ul><li>"This is a big deal for JD. He is going to the Super Bowl," one U.S. official told Axios.</li></ul><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> While the <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/08/us-iran-peace-talks-vance-pakistan-saturday" target="_blank">meeting itself</a> is historic — the most high-level engagement between U.S. and Iranian officials since 1979 — the chances for success appear low. Both sides know the risk of failure is renewed war, but have clashing visions for peace.</p><hr /><ul><li>"We still don't agree on what we are negotiating about," another U.S. official said.</li><li>The countries have spent the lead-up to the talks accusing each other of ceasefire violations. The Iranians threatened not to show up at all, though state media later reported they'd touched down in Islamabad.</li><li>While Vance was in the air, Trump made a thinly veiled threat to kill Iran's leaders if they don't play ball.</li></ul><p><strong>Driving the news:</strong> The talks are expected to start on Saturday in Islamabad, with the sides negotiating directly and Pakistani officials serving as mediators.</p><ul><li>Vance will be accompanied at the talks by Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. His delegation also includes officials from the National Security Council and departments of State and Defense.</li><li>"We are looking forward to the negotiation. I think it is going to be positive," Vance said before departing Andrews Air Force Base. He said Trump gave the negotiating team "pretty clear guidelines."</li><li>"If the Iranians are willing to negotiate in good faith, we are willing to extend the open hand... if they try to play us they are going to find that the negotiating team is not that receptive," Vance said. </li></ul><p><strong>The other side:</strong> Two hours after Vance left Washington, his counterpart in the negotiations reiterated his threat to boycott the talks if Iran's conditions aren't met.</p><ul><li>"Two of the measures mutually agreed upon between the parties have yet to be implemented: a ceasefire in Lebanon and the release of Iran's blocked assets prior to the commencement of negotiations. These two matters must be fulfilled before negotiations begin," Speaker of Parliament Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf wrote on X. </li><li>It's not clear which blocked assets Ghalibaf was referring to. During the negotiations in February, the Trump administration considered unfreezing $6 billion held in a bank account in Qatar and allowing Iran to use it to buy food and medicine.</li><li>Trump then published a post of his own: "The Iranians don't seem to realize they have no cards, other than a short term extortion of the World by using International Waterways. The only reason they are alive today is to negotiate!"</li><li>Despite his threat, Ghalibaf landed in Islamabad on Friday.</li></ul><p><strong>Behind the scenes:</strong> Vance asked Trump for a role in Iran diplomacy, two U.S. sources said. Another reason he came to lead the U.S. delegation is the bad blood between Trump's envoys and the Iranians after two previous sets of talks ended in war, according to the sources.</p><ul><li>Iranian officials have told the mediators they think Witkoff and Kushner deceived them, and that — given Vance's seniority and skepticism about going to war in the first place — having the VP involved could enable progress, the sources said.</li><li>"Vance asked for the ball and he got it. He can be responsible for getting the deal that will end the war," a U.S. official said. </li><li>"Of course the vice president wanted to be involved in such an important moment, and when the president asked he enthusiastically agreed to lead the negotiations," a source close to Vance said.</li></ul><p><strong>Yes, but:</strong> While sending Vance is a signal the U.S. is serious, some officials are concerned that sending such a high-level principal might be premature, as so little groundwork has been laid for the negotiations.</p><ul><li>The source close to Vance rejected that characterization and said Witkoff and Kushner had been negotiating with Iran for weeks</li><li>"The Vice President, Secretary of State, Special Envoy, and Mr. Kushner have always been collaborating on these discussions about Iran, and the President is optimistic that a deal can be reached that can lead to lasting peace in the Middle East," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said.</li></ul><p><strong>The intrigue:</strong> While some skeptics of the war within the MAGA base see Vance as an ally, Trump has <a href="https://truthsocial.com/%40realDonaldTrump/posts/116376634773749603" target="_blank">been on the attack</a> against those voices and leaning toward hawkish figures like commentator Mark Levin who have praised his decision to go to war.</p><ul><li>"The Tucker Carlson side of the party got shit on by Trump. That's not good news for JD," a source close to Trump said. </li><li>Trump also made clear over the last 24 hours that he's frustrated by Iran's behavior — especially the refusal to open the Strait of Hormuz — and that the U.S. is replenishing ammo to resume the fighting if talks fail.</li><li>"In theory, Trump wants a deal, but he is also getting ready to resume the war. The way the Iranians behave pissed him off. They are sort of embarrassing the guy," the U.S. source said. </li></ul><p><strong>What to watch:</strong> U.S. officials say it's unclear if any meaningful progress can be achieved in the first round of negotiations, but they hope it will be more than just a ceremonial meeting.</p><ul><li>Hammering out a deal will take weeks if not months, and would likely require an extension of the two-week ceasefire. </li><li>That won't happen unless Vance returns with some sort of deliverable, a U.S. official said. </li></ul>
Progress has been made towards a peace deal with some issues “concluded,” Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf said, but he warned Iran still has a “complete distrust” of the U.S. negotiators
<p>The list of contested issues that the U.S. and Iran will have to come to some form of agreement on is long and complex. </p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.twz.com/news-features/irans-chokehold-on-hormuz-remains-on-the-eve-of-peace-talks-in-pakistan">Iran’s Chokehold On Hormuz Remains On The Eve Of Peace Talks In Pakistan (Updated)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.twz.com">The War Zone</a>.</p>