Two GOP Senators Threaten to Sink Trump's AG Pick Over IRS Deal
Intra-Party Split Detected
Republican Sens. Cornyn and Tillis are blocking their own party's AG nominee, Todd Blanche, demanding written assurances that a Trump-linked 'anti-weaponization fund' and IRS audit immunity provisions are curtailed, putting them at odds with the Trump administration and most Senate Republicans who support confirmation.
Left says
- •The episode underscores how a settlement Trump's own Justice Department negotiated with itself granted him and his family sweeping tax audit immunity, raising conflict-of-interest concerns.
- •The now-scrapped $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' risked compensating convicted Jan. 6 rioters, which drew bipartisan alarm and highlights how the settlement was designed to benefit Trump-aligned figures.
- •A federal judge already found Trump's underlying IRS lawsuit was brought in 'bad faith' and sanctioned people involved, including Blanche himself, casting doubt on his fitness to lead the DOJ.
- •That even Republican senators are demanding written guarantees shows how unusual and legally shaky the DOJ's settlement with the president actually is.
Right says
- •Cornyn and Tillis are simply insisting the Justice Department put in writing what Blanche already testified to under oath, a reasonable request for accountability rather than obstruction.
- •Both senators have publicly clashed with Trump before and neither is up for reelection, so their independent stance reflects genuine policy concerns rather than partisan loyalty tests.
- •Blanche has repeatedly and publicly said the anti-weaponization fund is dead, and the senators simply want that commitment locked in against any future revival.
- •The holdup is procedural and resolvable — the DOJ has been sending revised language, and the goal is to get Blanche successfully confirmed, not to sink his nomination outright.
Common Take
High Consensus- The Senate Judiciary Committee postponed its Thursday vote on Blanche's nomination after Cornyn and Tillis withheld support.
- The dispute centers on written assurances that the $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund is dead and that Trump's tax audit immunity is limited in scope.
- Blanche has publicly stated multiple times that the fund is dead, and DOJ has been negotiating revised language with the senators' staff.
- Grassley's office says the goal remains securing enough committee support to advance Blanche's nomination successfully.
The Arguments
Left argues
A Justice Department controlled by Trump negotiated a settlement with Trump himself that granted him and his family sweeping tax audit immunity, an arrangement that inherently raises conflict-of-interest concerns since the same executive branch was on both sides of the deal.
Right counters
The fact that two Republican senators are demanding written changes and holding up a Trump nominee over these very concerns shows the system of checks worked exactly as intended, regardless of who negotiated the original deal.
Right argues
Cornyn and Tillis are not obstructing for partisan reasons — neither is up for reelection, both have clashed with Trump before, and they are simply asking the DOJ to formalize in writing what Blanche already swore to under oath, a reasonable accountability request.
Left counters
The need for senators to demand written guarantees against a president's own Justice Department reveals just how little trust exists that Blanche's sworn testimony reflects the actual scope of the settlement, which is itself a damning indictment of the deal's legitimacy.
Left argues
A federal judge already found that Trump's underlying IRS lawsuit was brought in 'bad faith' for an 'improper purpose' and sanctioned people involved, including Blanche himself, which raises serious doubts about the nominee's fitness and the integrity of the entire settlement process.
Right counters
Blanche's actions occurred while serving as the president's personal attorney zealously advocating a client's position, not as attorney general, and the settlement's most controversial piece — the weaponization fund — has already been abandoned in response to legitimate concerns.
Right argues
The anti-weaponization fund is dead — Blanche has said so repeatedly and publicly, the DOJ has been actively sending revised language to negotiators, and the holdup is a resolvable procedural dispute over documentation, not a fundamental disagreement about policy.
Left counters
If the fund is truly dead and Blanche has said so under oath, the administration's refusal to simply put that same commitment in writing for over a week suggests either bad faith or an intention to preserve the option of reviving it later, which is exactly what Trump's own comments have suggested.
Left argues
The now-scrapped $1.8 billion fund risked directly compensating convicted January 6 rioters, a prospect so alarming it drew bipartisan opposition and exposed how the settlement's design served to benefit Trump-aligned figures rather than genuine victims of government overreach.
Right counters
The bipartisan backlash against the fund is precisely why it was scrapped in June, demonstrating that the process of political accountability functioned correctly — the fund never disbursed a dollar to anyone, let alone rioters.
Challenge Questions
These questions target genuine internal contradictions — meant to provoke honest reflection.
Right asks Left
“If the settlement's most troubling provision was already killed in June after bipartisan outcry, and two independent Republican senators are actively holding the administration accountable in real time, doesn't that undercut the claim that the process reveals a fundamentally corrupt or unchecked system?”
Left asks Right
“If Blanche's sworn testimony is trustworthy enough to confirm him as attorney general, why is it necessary to extract separate written guarantees from the DOJ before voting — and what does that gap between trusting his word and demanding paper proof say about confidence in the settlement itself?”
Outlier Report
Left Fringe
Figures like Rep. Jamie Raskin or commentators such as MSNBC's Rachel Maddow represent a fringe pushing for Blanche's outright rejection and framing this as proof of systemic corruption requiring impeachment-level scrutiny; this represents roughly 15-20% of the left.
Right Fringe
Pro-Trump commentators like Charlie Kirk or figures close to the White House who dismiss Cornyn and Tillis's concerns entirely as disloyal grandstanding by senators already estranged from Trump (Cornyn lost his primary) represent an extreme minimizing stance, roughly 15-20% of the right.
Noise Assessment
Moderate-to-high; much of the intensity comes from Beltway and cable news framing wars over Trump-DOJ entanglement, while the general public likely views this as a procedural Senate dispute rather than a defining political battle, muting broader engagement.
Sources (14)
Thursday vote on Blanche's confirmation as AG is postponed, Grassley's office says
Republican Sen. John Cornyn has demanded formal modifications to an agreement the Justice Department made with President Trump to settle his lawsuit against the IRS.
‘There is no ‘deal’ on Blanche nom’
Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis demanded written proposals to modify the Trump IRS settlement, derailing Todd Blanche's confirmation vote.
A planned vote this week to advance Todd Blanche’s nomination for attorney general appears in doubt.
Two Republicans on the Judiciary Committee said they have not received the assurances they’re seeking from the Justice Department regarding the Trump-IRS settlement.
In today’s edition, we dig into the uncertain paths forward for Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination and the Iran war.
John Cornyn and Thom Tillis accused the attorney general nominee of refusing to put on paper his promise to kill aspects of the deal he cut to settle President Trump’s suit against the agency.
Also, Fauci invokes the Fifth Amendment. Here’s the latest at the end of Wednesday.
<p>Republican John Cornyn says he will not back nomination without written confirmation $1.8bn slush fund is dead</p><p>Todd Blanche’s hopes of becoming US attorney general seemed to be in jeopardy on Wednesday after the Department of Justice did not provide written assurances to a key Republican senator that a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/02/trump-weaponization-fund">$1.8bn slush fund</a> was dead.</p><p>The US Senate judiciary committee postponed a vote scheduled for Thursday on whether to advance Blanche’s nomination.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/29/todd-blanche-nomination">Continue reading...</a>
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) late Wednesday evening canceled a scheduled meeting to consider the nomination of acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to lead the Justice Department amid opposition from some GOP senators on the panel. “Chairman Grassley works to set President Trump’s nominees up for success in committee, not failure. Senators Cornyn…
The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to postpone a scheduled Thursday vote on Todd Blanche's nomination for attorney general as two Republicans on the panel are not yet prepared to support him.
A planned vote to move forward with Todd Blanche's nomination for attorney general appeared in doubt Wednesday as a key Republican senator demanded more assurances from the Justice Department about the settlement of President Donald Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, a face of the government’s pandemic response, invoked his Fifth Amendment right to decline to answer questions before the Senate Homeland Security panel and a critical Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on COVID-19’s origins. Fauci repeatedly took the Fifth under questioning on queries related to COVID and not. In concluding the hearing, Paul…