Utah Supreme Court Justice Resigns Amid Affair Allegations With Redistricting Attorney
Left says
- •The resignation protects judicial independence by removing a justice whose impartiality had been compromised by personal relationships with case attorneys
- •Republican leaders weaponized unsubstantiated allegations to pressure out a justice who ruled against their gerrymandering efforts
- •The investigation violated due process since the Judicial Conduct Commission had already dismissed the complaint after a thorough review
- •Political attacks on judges threaten the separation of powers and undermine public confidence in an independent judiciary
Right says
- •The justice's relationship with an attorney arguing redistricting cases created an obvious conflict of interest that compromised judicial integrity
- •Hagen's participation in redistricting decisions before recusing herself calls into question the legitimacy of rulings that favored Democratic interests
- •The resignation validates concerns about judicial bias and demonstrates accountability when ethical standards are violated
- •Proper judicial conduct requires avoiding even the appearance of impropriety to maintain public trust in the courts
Common Take
High Consensus- Justice Hagen resigned effective immediately after facing allegations of an improper relationship with redistricting attorney David Reymann
- The Judicial Conduct Commission had previously dismissed the complaint against Hagen after conducting an investigation
- Hagen recused herself from all cases involving Reymann in May 2025 after reconnecting with him during her divorce
- Governor Cox will announce the process for filling Hagen's vacant Supreme Court seat in the coming days
The Arguments
Right argues
Justice Hagen's participation in redistricting decisions before recusing herself created a clear conflict of interest that compromised the integrity of rulings that significantly altered Utah's congressional representation. The appearance of impropriety alone is sufficient to undermine public trust in judicial impartiality.
Left counters
Hagen recused herself from all cases involving the attorney once she recognized the potential conflict, demonstrating proper ethical conduct. The Judicial Conduct Commission, the only authorized body to investigate such matters, conducted a thorough review and dismissed the complaint as unsubstantiated.
Left argues
Republican leaders weaponized unproven allegations to pressure out a justice who ruled against their gerrymandering efforts, undermining judicial independence and the separation of powers. The investigation violated due process since the official Judicial Conduct Commission had already cleared Hagen after a proper review.
Right counters
The resignation itself validates the seriousness of the ethical concerns, as Hagen chose to step down rather than defend her conduct. Proper judicial accountability requires addressing conflicts of interest regardless of political implications, and public officials must accept higher scrutiny.
Right argues
The timing and nature of the relationship raises questions about whether Hagen's judicial decisions were influenced by personal relationships rather than legal merit. Judicial ethics require avoiding even the appearance of impropriety to maintain the legitimacy of court rulings.
Left counters
There is no evidence that Hagen's decisions were influenced by the relationship, and she properly recused herself once the personal connection was established. Political pressure campaigns against judges based on unsubstantiated allegations threaten the independence necessary for fair judicial review.
Left argues
The inappropriate release of private documents and the public pressure campaign represent a dangerous precedent of political interference in judicial matters. This undermines the constitutional principle of an independent judiciary free from political retaliation for unpopular but legally sound decisions.
Right counters
Transparency and accountability are essential for public trust in the judiciary, and serious ethical allegations must be addressed through proper channels. The resignation demonstrates that the judicial system can police itself when conflicts of interest arise.
Challenge Questions
These questions target genuine internal contradictions — meant to provoke honest reflection.
Right asks Left
“If the Judicial Conduct Commission's dismissal of the complaint was definitive and proper, why would Justice Hagen choose to resign rather than continue serving, especially given her stated commitment to upholding the rule of law?”
Left asks Right
“How can you argue that this was purely about judicial ethics when Republican leaders announced their investigation only after losing the redistricting case, and why didn't they raise these concerns when the alleged relationship began rather than after an unfavorable ruling?”
Outlier Report
Left Fringe
Progressive judicial reform advocates like those at Fix the Court or certain Democratic legal scholars who might argue this represents Republican intimidation of judges, representing roughly 15-20% of the left coalition.
Right Fringe
Hard-right commentators like those at Gateway Pundit or certain Trump-aligned figures who might claim this proves systematic Democratic corruption in the judiciary, representing roughly 25-30% of the right coalition.
Noise Assessment
Moderate noise level - while partisan outlets frame this differently, the core issue of judicial ethics resonates broadly with the public beyond partisan talking points.
Sources (8)
<img src="https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/utah-supreme-court-justice-abruptly-resigns-after-accusation-involving-redistricting-attorney.png?id=66712732&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C10%2C0%2C11" /><br /><br /><p>A Utah Supreme Court justice resigned from the court after being accused of a conflict of interest from a personal relationship with the former attorney for the League of Women Voters.</p><p>Justice Diana Hagen recused herself from all cases involving David Reymann in May 2025, but new suspicions were raised due to allegations from her ex-husband.</p><p class="pull-quote">She claimed that she recused herself from cases involving Reymann after reconnecting.</p><p>Reymann had been the lead attorney arguing that <a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/clear-example-of-judicial-activism-judge-gives-democrats-a-boost-with-congressional-map-in-red-state" target="_blank">Republican redistricting efforts</a> in the state were illegal.</p><p>The complaint alleging Hagen had been biased in siding against redistricting was <a href="https://www.abc4.com/news/politics/inside-utah-politics/utah-supreme-court-justice-diana-hagen-resigns/" target="_blank">submitted</a> to both Chief Justice Matthew Durrant and the Judicial Conduct Commission in Dec. 2025.</p><p>Hagen denied any wrongdoing.</p><p>"The insinuation that I was ethically compromised while carrying out my official duties is patently false," she said in a previous statement.</p><p>She admitted that she reconnected with friends in the wake of her failed marriage in 2025, and one of those friends was Reymann. She claimed that she recused herself from cases involving Reymann after reconnecting.</p><p>The Utah Supreme Court dismissed the complaint after an investigation.</p><p>"As the sole entity authorized to investigate allegations of misconduct against a judge, the Judicial Conduct Commission received the allegations in their entirety and conducted an independent investigation," the court said. "The Judicial Conduct Commission completed their investigation in accordance with their constitutional and statutory authority and dismissed the complaint against Justice Hagen."</p><p>The court added that some related documents had been "inappropriately released to the public."</p><p><strong>RELATED: </strong><a href="http://theblaze.com/news/clear-example-of-judicial-activism-judge-gives-democrats-a-boost-with-congressional-map-in-red-state" target="_blank"><strong>'Clear example of judicial activism': Judge gives Democrats a boost with Utah congressional map in red state</strong></a></p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube"> <span class="rm-shortcode" style="display: block; padding-top: 56.25%;"></span> </p><p>Utah Gov. Spencer Cox (R) said that the state would announce the process to fill Hagen's seat in the coming days.</p><p>Hagen was <a href="https://governor.utah.gov/press/new-supreme-court-justice/" target="_blank">nominated</a> to the highest Utah court by Gov. Cox in 2022.</p><p><em>Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. </em><em><a href="https://www.theblaze.com/newsletters/theblaze-articlelink" target="_self">Sign up here</a></em><em>! </em></p>
'[M]y family and friends did not choose public life'
Utah Supreme Court Justice Diana Hagen resigned effective immediately amid a probe into her alleged relationship with a redistricting attorney.
Hagen's resignation followed Cox and state legislative leaders announcing an investigation into allegations of the affair.
<p>Hagen recused herself from the redistricting case in September and from all related hearings.</p> The post <a href="https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/05/utah-supreme-court-justice-resigns-amid-affair-allegations-with-redistricting-lawyer/">Utah Supreme Court Justice Resigns Amid Affair Allegations With Redistricting Lawyer</a> first appeared on <a href="https://legalinsurrection.com">Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion</a>.
A Utah judge on Friday rejected a request by Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing conservative icon Charlie Kirk, to ban live TV and still photography from courtroom proceedings but accepted his motion to delay a key hearing.
The judge said the defense team did not prove that Utah law would allow a ban of media cameras inside the courtroom.