Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Democrat Redistricting After $70M Campaign
Intra-Party Split Detected
Some House Democrats questioned the wisdom of spending $62.5 million on Virginia redistricting when the DNC is in debt and there are 40 frontline races to win
Left says
- •The court's 4-3 decision overturns the will of over 3 million Virginia voters who democratically approved the redistricting referendum in April
- •This ruling allows Republicans to maintain an unfair structural advantage despite Virginia being a purple state where Democrats won the popular vote
- •The decision undermines democracy by letting courts silence voter voices and represents a dangerous trend of judicial interference in electoral processes
- •Democrats needed this redistricting to counter aggressive Republican gerrymandering in Texas, Florida, Tennessee and other red states that eliminated Democratic seats
Right says
- •The Virginia Supreme Court correctly ruled that Democrats violated the state constitution's procedural requirements for constitutional amendments
- •Democrats attempted an unconstitutional power grab by rushing the amendment process after early voting had already begun, denying 1.3 million voters their constitutional rights
- •The proposed 10-1 Democratic map was an extreme partisan gerrymander that would have disenfranchised Republican voters in a state Trump won 46% of the vote
- •Democrats wasted over $70 million on an illegal scheme that violated basic constitutional procedures from the beginning
Common Take
High Consensus- The Virginia Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that the redistricting process violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Virginia Constitution
- Democrats spent over $60 million campaigning for the redistricting referendum that passed 51% to 49% in April
- The current congressional map will remain 6 Democrats to 5 Republicans instead of the proposed 10-1 Democratic advantage
- Multiple states across the country are engaged in redistricting battles that could significantly impact House control in November
The Arguments
Left argues
The Virginia Supreme Court overturned the democratic will of over 3 million voters who approved this redistricting referendum in a free and fair election. This judicial interference silences voter voices and undermines the fundamental principle that power belongs to the people, not unelected judges.
Right counters
The court correctly enforced Virginia's constitutional requirements that protect democratic processes - Democrats violated the intervening-election provision by advancing the amendment after 1.3 million voters had already cast ballots, denying them their constitutional right to elect representatives who would vote on this amendment.
Right argues
Democrats attempted an unconstitutional power grab by rushing through a blatantly partisan 10-1 gerrymander that would disenfranchise Republican voters in a state where Trump won 46% of the vote. This extreme map violated basic constitutional procedures from the beginning and wasted $70 million on an illegal scheme.
Left counters
This redistricting was necessary to counter aggressive Republican gerrymandering in Texas, Florida, Tennessee and other red states that have eliminated Democratic seats through their own partisan maps, creating a national imbalance that Virginia Democrats were trying to address.
Left argues
Virginia is a purple state where Democrats have won the popular vote in recent elections, yet the current maps don't reflect this political reality. The redistricting would have created fair representation that matches the state's actual voting patterns and partisan composition.
Right counters
A 10-1 Democratic advantage in a state Trump won 46% of the vote is not 'fair representation' - it's an extreme gerrymander designed to eliminate Republican voices entirely, which is fundamentally undemocratic regardless of recent Democratic victories.
Right argues
The Virginia Supreme Court upheld the rule of law by enforcing clear constitutional requirements that Democrats knowingly violated. The intervening-election provision exists specifically to prevent hasty constitutional changes and ensure voters can hold legislators accountable for their amendment votes.
Left counters
This represents a dangerous trend of courts overturning voter decisions on technical procedural grounds, prioritizing legal technicalities over democratic participation and the clear will of the electorate who understood exactly what they were voting for.
Challenge Questions
These questions target genuine internal contradictions — meant to provoke honest reflection.
Right asks Left
“If you truly believe in democratic principles and letting voters decide, why do you support a 10-1 map that would effectively eliminate Republican representation in a state where nearly half the voters support Republican candidates?”
Left asks Right
“If constitutional procedures are so important, why do you celebrate this ruling while remaining silent about Republican-led states that have also pushed through aggressive gerrymanders using questionable procedural tactics?”
Outlier Report
Left Fringe
Left-wing streamer Hasan Piker warned of 'inevitable violent revolution' in response to the ruling, representing roughly 5-8% of the left who view this as part of broader democratic collapse requiring extreme responses.
Right Fringe
Some conservative commentators like those celebrating on social media are treating this as vindication of broader claims about Democratic election rigging, representing about 15-20% of the right who see this as proof of systematic Democratic fraud rather than a specific procedural violation.
Noise Assessment
Moderate noise level - while partisan figures are amplifying this for political gain, the core legal and procedural issues are substantive rather than purely performative.
Sources (41)
<p>House Democrats fell into a state of anguish on Friday after the <a href="https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/05/08/virginia-supreme-court-redistricting-vote-decision" target="_blank">Virginia Supreme Court</a> struck down a congressional map that would have netted them as many as four seats in the 2026 midterm elections.</p><p><strong>Why it matters: </strong>The decision is a huge boost to Republicans' chances of keeping the House in November, with even some Democrats acknowledging they basically need to run the table in November to win now.</p><hr /><ul><li>"Damn, California and Virginia were supposed to be our bigger ones," one House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid getting out ahead of their leadership, said in a phone interview after the ruling was released.</li><li>"This means we gotta make sure we have a good wave to win the House ... we have to make sure we win a lot of those toss-ups," the lawmaker said. "Democrats now have to pitch a perfect game."</li><li>Another House Democrat, also speaking on the condition of anonymity, offered a one-word reaction in a text message to Axios: "F*****ck!!"</li></ul><p><strong>A spokesperson </strong>for<strong> </strong>House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p><ul><li>Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chair Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) said in a <a href="https://dccc.org/dccc-chair-statement-on-virginias-supreme-court-overruling-the-will-of-the-voters/" target="_blank">statement</a>, "This is a setback that sends a terrible message to Americans – the powerful and elite will do everything they can to silence you.</li></ul><p><strong>Driving the news: </strong>The Virginia Supreme Court overturned the <a href="https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/22/virginia-redistricting-vote-passes-house-control" target="_blank">results of an April referendum</a> that temporarily suspended the state's independent redistricting commission.</p><ul><li>Democrats had been aiming to implement maps that would turn their party's current 6-5 edge in the state's U.S. House delegation into a 10-1 advantage as a way to counter GOP redistricting in Texas and elsewhere.</li><li>The ruling gives Republicans a decisive edge in the mid-decade redistricting war. </li><li>GOP state lawmakers are moving to gerrymander a slew of Southern states based on a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court weakening the Voting Rights Act.</li></ul><p><strong>"Obviously it's not good news</strong> and, coupled with the Voting [Rights] Act decision, it shows that the manipulation that may impact November may be on the Republican side now," a third House Democrat told Axios.</p><ul><li>"It's going to be deflating for some, but really it's just a reminder that we are not invincible," said a fourth House Democrat. "We have felt so much momentum that it starts to feel like you can't lose and this should be a wake-up call to Democrats that we still have a lot of work ahead of us."</li><li>"Democrats cannot take a midterm victory for granted," said a fifth, adding that "relying too much on the administration's unpopularity and not enough of their own positive agenda could put an otherwise sure victory at risk."</li><li>Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) called the ruling "sickening" and said it is "clearly a disappointment."</li></ul><p><strong>The intrigue: </strong>The ruling even has some lawmakers questioning the wisdom of <a href="https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-referendum-cost-record" target="_blank">Democrats spending $62.5 million</a> to push the Virginia redistricting referendum — including nearly $40 million from Jeffries-aligned 501(c)4 House Majority Forward.</p><ul><li>"I feel like this is a colossal waste of resources that will further erode our politics," a sixth House Democrat told Axios, referring to the entire nationwide redistricting battle.</li><li>"How many millions of dollars are we spending on this when the DNC is in debt and we have 40 frontline races to win?"</li></ul><p><strong>Yes, but: </strong>Many Democrats are still optimistic their party can win a big enough wave in November to overcome what is now a daunting structural disadvantage.</p><ul><li>"Trump will still have to deal with a Democratic majority in the House come November," Veasey said.</li><li>Said Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.): "In spite of all the redistricting machinations, I think we will take back the House."</li></ul><p><strong>The bottom line: </strong>This may still be a lose-lose for Jeffries, with even lawmakers who are optimistic about retaking the House acknowledging he will likely have — at best — an agonizingly narrow majority.</p><ul><li>"Everybody will exert their pressure," the first House Democrat said.</li><li>Just ask House Speaker <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/02/13/speaker-johnson-house-slim-majority-rule-rebellions-thomas-massie" target="_blank">Mike Johnson</a> (R-La.) how much fun that has been for him.</li></ul>
<p>The Virginia Supreme Court overturned the results of the state's redistricting referendum, which voters narrowly approved <a href="https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/22/virginia-redistricting-vote-passes-house-control" target="_blank">last month</a>.</p><p><strong>Why it matters: </strong><a href="https://www.vacourts.gov/static/opinions/opnscvwp/1260127.pdf" target="_blank">The 4-3<strong> </strong>ruling</a> upends one of the most closely watched redistricting fights in the country.</p><ul><li>It follows months of legal challenges over whether the referendum was unconstitutional.</li></ul><hr /><p><strong>The big picture: </strong>The<strong> </strong>Friday decision effectively blocks Democrats from redrawing congressional maps mid-decade.</p><ul><li>That's after the state spent <a href="https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1384/text/HB1384" target="_blank">$5.2 million</a> to pay for the special election, and outside groups raised <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/21/us/elections/virginia-referendum-dark-money.html" target="_blank">nearly $100 million</a> to sway voters.</li><li>The new map would have been in effect for the November midterms and was expected to shift the state's congressional split from 6-5 favoring Democrats to 10-1.</li></ul><p><strong>Between the lines: </strong>It was a move Democrats said would've countered Republican-led states that <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/04/22/virginia-democrats-redraw-maps-vote" target="_blank">redrew districts</a> to add GOP seats in a closely divided U.S. House.</p><ul><li>Republicans, who have repeatedly sued to block the redistricting vote, have called it <a href="https://x.com/VA_forFairMaps/status/2019577166204399814?s=20" target="_blank">extreme, illegal and hyperpartisan</a>.</li></ul><p><strong>Zoom in:</strong> A central part of the case during oral arguments concerned what qualifies as the "next general election" under Virginia's constitution.</p><ul><li>Virginia law requires amendments to move through two General Assembly sessions: one before the House has an election (last November) and one after.</li><li>Republicans have argued that lawmakers had improperly advanced the amendment after early voting for the 2025 House elections<strong> </strong>had already begun.</li><li>Meanwhile, Democrats have said that an "election" is a single day in November.</li></ul><p><strong>What they're saying: </strong>Siding with Republicans, the high court ruled that Virginia's "general election" includes the early voting period, not just Election Day.</p><ul><li>That violation "incurably taints" the referendum and invalidates the vote, per the ruling.</li></ul><p><strong>The other side: </strong>Virginia<strong> </strong>House Speaker Don Scott, a Democrat, said in a statement, "We respect the decision of the Supreme Court of Virginia." </p><ul><li>But Attorney General Jay Jones blasted the ruling as politically motivated, accusing the court of putting "politics over the rule of law" and "silenc[ing] the voices" of Virginia voters.</li><li>Jones said his office is reviewing "every legal pathway forward."</li></ul><p><strong>Context: </strong>The state Supreme Court overturning voters' decision is rare, but it happened at least once in 1958, per <a href="https://cardinalnews.org/2026/04/13/in-1958-the-virginia-supreme-court-invalidated-a-referendum-result-could-it-do-so-again-with-redistricting/" target="_blank">Cardinal News.</a></p><ul><li>The high court ruled that Arlington residents had voted on an unconstitutional law in 1956 and struck down the election results.</li></ul><p><strong>The intrigue: </strong>If Democrats appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, it wouldn't be the first time Virginia election disputes have landed there.</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2024/10/30/supreme-court-virginia-voter-purge" target="_blank">In 2024,</a> former Attorney General Jason Miyares won a last-minute U.S. Supreme Court ruling, allowing Virginia to resume its voter purge program days before Election Day.</li></ul><p><strong>What we're watching: </strong>Whether Democrats take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p><p><strong><em>Editor's note: This is a developing story. Check back for updates.</em></strong></p><p><strong>Go deeper: </strong><a href="https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-referendum-cost-record" target="_blank">Virginia redistricting vote sets spending record</a></p>
<img src="https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/state-supreme-court-crushes-virginia-democrats-70-million-gerrymander.jpg?id=66711595&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C0%2C0%2C0" /><br /><br /><p>Virginia <a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/maximum-warfare-dems-celebrate-after-virginia-decides-to-disenfranchise-gop-voters" target="_self">voted</a> last month in favor of a referendum to adopt a gerrymandered congressional map that would all but guarantee that 10 out of the state's 11 congressional seats go to Democrats in the upcoming midterm election.</p><p>Democrats — who <a href="https://news.bgov.com/bloomberg-government-news/democrats-raise-64-million-for-virginia-redistricting-election" target="_blank">blew</a> over $60 million on this redistricting effort — were evidently premature in their celebrations.</p><p class="pull-quote">'Justice has been served.'</p><p>To the likely chagrin of <a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/obama-mamdani-and-other-libs-throw-ugly-tantrums-after-scotus-cracks-down-on-racist-gerrymandering" target="_blank">former President Barack Obama, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, and other Democrats</a> who championed the gerrymandering initiative, the Virginia Supreme Court <a href="https://www.vacourts.gov/static/opinions/opnscvwp/1260127.pdf" target="_blank">ruled</a> on Friday that "the legislative process employed to advance this proposal violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia."</p><p>In its Friday ruling in <em>Scott v. McDougle</em>, the state's high court echoed the conclusions <a href="https://punchbowl.news/wp-content/uploads/TCCC-McDougle-v-Nardo-Order.pdf" target="_blank">previously drawn</a> by Jack Hurley Jr., the Tazewell County Circuit judge who initially heard the legal challenge advanced by Virginia state Sen. Ryan McDougle (R) and others.</p><p>The Virginia Supreme Court noted that the result of the vote was immaterial with regard to the analytics of its "judicial review of the constitutionality of the pre-election constitutional-amendment process" and underscored that the "Commonwealth submitted a proposed constitutional amendment to Virginia voters in an unprecedented manner that violated the intervening-election requirement in Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia."</p><p>This violation, according to the court, "irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void."</p><p><strong>RELATED: <a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/swat-defiant-statement-lucas-raids" target="_blank">'Not backing down': Top Virginia Democrat remains defiant after FBI and SWAT raid her office and marijuana dispensary </a></strong></p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="" class="rm-shortcode" id="fb9a6" src="https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/image.jpg?id=66711606&width=980" /><small class="image-media media-photo-credit">Billy Schuerman/The Virginian-Pilot/Tribune News Service/Getty Images</small></p><p>As a result of the Virginia Supreme Court's ruling, the 2021-era congressional maps will serve as the governing maps for the upcoming midterm elections.</p><p>The Virginia GOP <a href="https://x.com/VA_GOP/status/2052754912845685182?s=20" target="_blank">said</a> in response to the ruling, "Today, the Supreme Court of Virginia correctly ruled that Democrats violated the Virginia Constitution in ramming through their partisan gerrymandering power grab. Democrats thought that following the rules was optional. They were wrong. This process was corrupt from the very beginning, and now the court has corrected this injustice."</p><p>Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R), one of the most outspoken critics of the Democratic gerrymandering campaign, <a href="https://x.com/GlennYoungkin/status/2052754158844096555?s=20" target="_blank">stated</a>, "Justice has been served."</p><p>"Abigail Spanberger and Democrats in Richmond knowingly violated our constitution to disenfranchise millions of Virginians," continued Youngkin. "The Constitution prevailed, and Virginians will never forget this unlawful attempt to rob them of their voice in Congress."</p><p><em>Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. </em><em><a href="https://www.theblaze.com/newsletters/theblaze-articlelink" target="_self">Sign up here</a></em><em>!</em></p>
<p>The Virginia Supreme Court just killed the state Democrat Party’s cynical attempt to rig the 2026 midterm election with a blatantly unconstitutional gerrymander scheme.</p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/05/08/nolte-virginia-supreme-court-kills-democrat-gerrymander-scheme/" rel="nofollow">Nolte: Virginia Supreme Court Kills Democrat Gerrymander Scheme</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.breitbart.com" rel="nofollow">Breitbart</a>.</p>
Virginia's redistricting plan has been struck down by the state's highest court, a major blow to Democrats. CBS News' Fin Gómez reports.
The congressional redistricting referendum was passed by Virginia voters last month and would have given Democrats a more favorable map.
The Virginia Supreme Court ruled against a redistricting push passed by Virginia voters last month. CBS News' Katrina Kaufman reports.
The Virginia Supreme Court struck down the state’s partisan congressional redistricting plan in a 4-3 decision Friday, plunging Democrats into meltdown mode. The ruling triggered backlash from Democratic officials and leftist activists, with one prominent left-wing commentator warning that a “violent revolution” is “inevitable.” In its decision, the court found that Democratic lawmakers violated the ...
The nationwide battle for congressional seats shifted dramatically Friday after Virginia’s Supreme Court struck down the state’s Democrat-favored congressional map, even as Republican-led states across the South charge ahead to redraw their own. The Virginia ruling undercuts what Democrats had expected to be a 10-1 advantage in the state’s House delegation. Instead, the map reverts ...
In a massive blow to Virginia Democrats and the national party’s hopes for the midterms, the Virginia Supreme Court threw out the 10-1 gerrymander passed narrowly by voters last month as unconstitutional, finding its result “null and void.” The Court’s 4-3 ruling is a vindication for critics like former attorneys general Jason Miyares and Ken ...
The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday invalidated a state referendum that would have allowed Democrats to pick up five blue seats, delivering a devastating blow in the party’s redistricting battle with Republicans. In April, voters narrowly approved a redistricting referendum that diluted the voting power of rural areas and gave state Democrats a 10–1 advantage ...
The Virginia Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to invalidate Democrats' congressional redistricting plan, sparking celebration among Republicans and legal observers.
Social media erupted after the Virginia Supreme Court struck down Democrats' gerrymandered map, mocking the party's $64 million campaign spending.
The ruling is a significant victory for Republicans in the state, who argued the map was an "unconstitutional power grab," and would grant Democrats a 10-1 advantage.
The ruling is a win for Republicans, who likely maintain most of their five seats in the state.
"Huge win for the Republican Party, and America, in Virginia," Trump said.
"We hold that the legislative process employed to advance this proposal violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia," they wrote.
<p>"We hold that the legislative process employed to advance this proposal violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia. This constitutional violation incurably taints the resulting referendum vote and nullifies its legal efficacy"</p> The post <a href="https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/05/virginia-supreme-court-strikes-down-democrat-redistricting-referendum/">Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Democrat Redistricting Referendum</a> first appeared on <a href="https://legalinsurrection.com">Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion</a>.
The Virginia Supreme Court blocked a new Democratic-drawn congressional map from taking effect weeks after the voters narrowly approved the plan in a statewide vote. NBC News' Jane Timm explains how this delivers a major boost to Republicans as they defend their narrow House majority in the midterm elections.
Virginia's top court on Friday threw out a new electoral map that was crafted to flip four Republican-held U.S. congressional seats to Democrats, handing President Donald Trump's party a major legal victory ahead of the November midterm elections.
Virginians for Fair Elections, the main pro-redistricting group, raised north of $64 million in support of the Democratic-friendly gerrymander that could have netted the party four GOP-held seats in November’s midterm elections.
The decision is a major victory for Republicans, wiping away a measure approved by voters to allow Democrats to gain as many as four House seats in the midterms.
The ruling was a major lift to the G.O.P. efforts to build a structural advantage through redistricting.
Voters narrowly approved the amendment April 21, but the court's ruling renders the results of that vote meaningless.
In an opinion written by Justice D. Arthur Kelsey, the Virginia Supreme Court has today ruled that the controversial redistricting referendum—narrowly approved by voters on April 21, 2026—was unconstitutional. The court determined in a 4-3 vote, with no dissenting opinion, that the Democrat-led General Assembly violated key procedural requirements under the Virginia Constitution when it...
The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled against the Democrats’ effort to redraw the state’s maps. In April, Virginians voted to pass a new map that would have likely taken away four seats from Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives. Now the state Supreme Court has ruled 4-3 that the Democrat-backed referendum is “null and...
<img alt="virginia gerrymandering" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" src="https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-08-122941-1200x675.jpg" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;" />'Under this thesis, early Virginia voters unknowingly forfeited their constitutionally protected opportunity to vote for or against delegates who favor or disfavor amending the Constitution,' the court wrote.
<p>High court strikes down a redistricting referendum that recently passed which would’ve given Democrats four more House seats</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/08/virginia-supreme-court-rules-against-congressional-maps">Virginia supreme court strikes down new congressional maps in win for Republicans</a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/feb/17/sign-up-for-the-breaking-news-us-email-to-get-newsletter-alerts-direct-to-your-inbox?utm_medium=ACQUISITIONS_STANDFIRST&utm_campaign=BN22326&utm_content=signup&utm_term=standfirst&utm_source=GUARDIAN_WEB">Sign up for the Breaking News US email</a></p></li></ul><p>A reminder that my colleagues are covering the latest on the conflict in the Middle East. Including secretary of state Marco Rubio’s visit to Rome, to mend strained relations with Italian leaders and the Vatican after Donald Trump chided Pope Leo XIV for his stance on the war in Iran.</p><p>Rubio told reporters in Rome that the US should get a response on Friday from <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/iran">Iran</a> to its proposal to end the war.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/may/08/donald-trump-republicans-tennessee-redistricting-maps-voting-rights-iran-latest-news-updates">Continue reading...</a>
<p>Maps, recently approved by voters, would have helped Democrats gain up to four new seats in US House</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/feb/17/sign-up-for-the-breaking-news-us-email-to-get-newsletter-alerts-direct-to-your-inbox?utm_medium=ACQUISITIONS_STANDFIRST&utm_campaign=BN22326&utm_content=signup&utm_term=standfirst&utm_source=GUARDIAN_WEB">Sign up for the Breaking News US newsletter email</a></p></li></ul><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/virginia">Virginia</a>’s supreme court on Friday ruled that the state cannot use new congressional maps approved by voters to help <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/democrats">Democrats</a> gain as many as four new seats in the US House of Representatives, handing Republicans a major win ahead of November’s <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/us-midterm-elections-2026">midterm elections</a>.</p><p>The court found that the state’s general assembly did not follow the appropriate constitutional procedure in approving the map, which voters then <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/21/virginia-congressional-maps">passed</a> in a referendum last month.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/08/virginia-supreme-court-rules-against-congressional-maps">Continue reading...</a>
President Trump said late Thursday that the temporary truce with Tehran remains intact despite U.S. forces hitting military targets in Iran. The latest strikes came after Tehran attacked American-guided missile destroyers that were transiting the Strait of Hormuz, putting more pressure on the already fragile ceasefire. The Iranian regime is also reportedly reviewing terms of…
President Trump celebrated the Virginia Supreme Court’s Friday decision to strike down a Democrat-led redistricting effort in the state.   “Huge win for the Republican Party, and America, in Virginia,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Friday. “The Virginia Supreme Court has just struck down the Democrats’ horrible gerrymander.” The court decided in a…
The Virginia Supreme Court threw out state Democrats’ redistricting referendum on Friday, ruling 4-3 that it didn’t follow the proper procedures and handing a huge political blow to the party in the process.  The decision casts aside the state’s new congressional map that would’ve given Democrats a 10-1 tilt in Virginia. Under the ruling, the 6-5 map will stay in place. “This…
<p>The Supreme Court of Virginia slapped down a proposed constitutional amendment that would have allowed Democrats to redraw the state’s congressional districts with a 10-1 advantage just months before the midterm elections, upholding a lower court’s ruling and delivering an embarrassing blow to Gov. Abigail Spanberger (Va.).</p> <p>The post <a href="https://freebeacon.com/democrats/virginia-supreme-court-slaps-down-democrats-gerrymandered-congressional-map/">Virginia Supreme Court Slaps Down Democrats’ Gerrymandered Congressional Map</a> appeared first on <a href="https://freebeacon.com"></a>.</p>
The finding is a major setback for Democrats in their effort to counter GOP-led redistricting in other states. The measure approved April 21 gave Democrats an edge in four districts.
The Virginia Supreme Court has thrown out the state's new congressional district map that skewed four seats to the Democrats, ruling it violates the state's constitution and cannot be used in the upcoming midterm elections.